<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Riddle of Gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/01/11/the-riddle-of-gender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/01/11/the-riddle-of-gender/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/01/11/the-riddle-of-gender/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=386#comment-430</guid>
		<description>I guess I better clarify a bit about the Notes format that I so dislike based on Angel&#039;s comment.

The book is HIGHLY readable without the Notes.

My gripe is the fact that they do exist but that you have to go find them IF you want to check a source, or look for a bit more explication on something.  Of course, since it is citing sources and scientific research, etc. it would be highly suspect if it didn&#039;t include the references in some form.  I, being the anal retentive about scholarly apparatus that I am, would prefer it to be more explicit.

But the book is certainly fully readable and understandable without worrying about the Notes.  Not implying anyone said I said otherwise, but maybe I wasn&#039;t clear enough.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I better clarify a bit about the Notes format that I so dislike based on Angel&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>The book is HIGHLY readable without the Notes.</p>
<p>My gripe is the fact that they do exist but that you have to go find them IF you want to check a source, or look for a bit more explication on something.  Of course, since it is citing sources and scientific research, etc. it would be highly suspect if it didn&#8217;t include the references in some form.  I, being the anal retentive about scholarly apparatus that I am, would prefer it to be more explicit.</p>
<p>But the book is certainly fully readable and understandable without worrying about the Notes.  Not implying anyone said I said otherwise, but maybe I wasn&#8217;t clear enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/01/11/the-riddle-of-gender/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=386#comment-429</guid>
		<description>It does sound like a fascinating read; you did   a gret job of pulling out some of the interesting ideas. I love your recommendation, especially for those none too comfortable with the topic. Hey, I am all for making uncomfortable people even more so. Not sure if I will read it soon. In part the time, but also in part your mention about the notes. I tend to find that little detail in scholarly books extremely irritating (having to go back and forth in a text) in pleasure reading. But it does sound interesting, so we&#039;ll see. Thanks for posting, and best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does sound like a fascinating read; you did   a gret job of pulling out some of the interesting ideas. I love your recommendation, especially for those none too comfortable with the topic. Hey, I am all for making uncomfortable people even more so. Not sure if I will read it soon. In part the time, but also in part your mention about the notes. I tend to find that little detail in scholarly books extremely irritating (having to go back and forth in a text) in pleasure reading. But it does sound interesting, so we&#8217;ll see. Thanks for posting, and best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/01/11/the-riddle-of-gender/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=386#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Hey!  No sarcasm allowed at this blog!  ;-)

It really is a fascinating read Laura.  And I really did find it a fast read.  But, yes, I full well know the luxury of &quot;copious spare-reading time.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  No sarcasm allowed at this blog!  <img src='http://marklindner.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It really is a fascinating read Laura.  And I really did find it a fast read.  But, yes, I full well know the luxury of &#8220;copious spare-reading time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/01/11/the-riddle-of-gender/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=386#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Thanks--looks fascinating.  I&#039;ll have to check it out, in my copious spare-reading time. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8211;looks fascinating.  I&#8217;ll have to check it out, in my copious spare-reading time. <img src='http://marklindner.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

