Today is the 1st anniversary of this humble little blog.
My 1st post was "So, what is this about, and for?" on Saturday, 29 January 1995 2005. A couple weeks ago I wrote a sort of pre-anniversary post, "Bloggy happiness," with some early reflections. I said most of what I wanted to in the "Bloggy happiness" post, but I’d like to add a few things.
I have written along these lines once before ("Blogging as Metaphor"), but here is another take on why I blog and a connection to the title of my blog from a book I am currently reading:
Ong used a particularly appropriate metaphor in describing oral patterns of communication when he commented ‘Oral discourse has commonly been thought of even in oral milieus as weaving or stitching’ (Ong 1982: 13). A particularly important aspect of orality and oral discourse is it s reliance on memory and repetition (its weaving together of information in particular, recognizable patterns), for in order to retain knowledge, information has to be passed on orally in repetitious manner until the listener has internalized and retained its meaning (32).
Finkelstein, D. and A. McCleary. An Introduction to Book History. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Metheun, 1982, reprinted 2002.
From the "Blogging as Metaphor" piece:
I think my blog has become a sort of sewing kit
for my life and my narrative. I am literally stitching the fragmented and compartmentalized pieces of my life back together. Some stitches are tight, some are loose, some may again ravel, and some may or may not get restitched.
So, why am I writing about blogging using oral metaphors? Because I think of much of this blog in particular, and of blogging generally, as a form of oral discourse. Or, at least, as an attempt to recreate oral discourse as much as possible in a written form. That, at least, is what I am trying to do. I do realize that, in the end, it is impossible. But, nonetheless, I will continue the attempt at real conversation via my blog as I continue to stitch my own life together and to stitch the lives of others to mine.
By the way, I highly recommend the Ong book.
On a different note, it seems like a fine time to show some of the recent search strings that found my blog:
what is the hypothesis of a broken family? (Google) – Well, I’m sure I don’t know, even if I have experienced a few.
urbana skinny (Google) – This is NOT my nickname! But maybe it should be.
agony "they enjoyed her" (Google) – I don’t think I want to know.
numbers of filipino citizens unemployed and employed last 2005 by spreadsheet (my Sep 05 archive page was the #1 result on Yahoo for this key word search) – I am sure that I am not an expert on this topic.
john seely brown is an asshole (#5 hit on Google for this page) – I’m really sorry to hear this. Maybe I should remove his book from my reading list.
indexer woman sex (Google) – Clearly my favorite seeing as I’m taking an Indexing class this semester. Maybe I’ll have to run this search myself….
Please help me continue the conversation. Feel free to comment or lurk, but comments will move the conversation along in a much more productive manner.
Peace. Love. Happy New Year and here’s to the Year of the Dog.
From the CNN.com page: "The Lunar New Year, also called the Spring Festival, is the most
important holiday for ethnic Chinese and a time when many of China’s
1.3 billion people traditionally head to their hometowns to be with
family."
In that case, I guess it was appropriate that I did go home this weekend for my Dad’s 70th birthday and to hang out with my childhood best friend, Dave, who found me just 2 weeks ago after almost 30 years. My sister and her family were able to fly in from DC, and my brother David made it home from Monterrey, CA too. Here’s to a wonderful Year of the Dog.
Congratulations on reaching your first anniversary. May you continue stitching your thoughts for time to come. I am not sure I can bring myself to read Ong’s work. After I left my doctoral program in English, rhetoric left a bad aftertaste for me (semilong story, really want to know, ask me sometime). I did read some of Ong when I was taking Theories of Composition. At any rate, the oral metaphor is probably very appropriate to our blogging. Blogging is often improvisational, conversational, and it depends on our memory, to the extent that we can so easily edit and/or remove stuff. I think it would make sense to a lot of people, that we try to (re)create conversations through our blogs, even for those who use it as just their personal diary. There is the tradition of many diaries being addressed to someone even if no one will read them, but that is a separate thing. Anyways, congratulations and best. Keep on blogging.
1995? You were prescient!
Thanks Karen! Prescient doesn’t even begin to describe that (mis)claim.
Congrats on a year of blogging! Glad to see you on Flickr too!
M.
Quick comment here to Angel — definitely read Ong — his work is fundamental to really understanding the relationship between the way we think when we talk and the way we think when we write. Blogging being what it is, his work has never been more relevant. And he’s a fine writer, so if you dig in, he’s fun to read.
Thanks to everyone on the well wishes!
And Angel, I definitely second T. Scott’s re-recommending of Ong. Hopefully you can tell me about the rhetoric aftertaste over some good Texas wine someday, but Orality and Literacy is fundamental. It is seriously one of the top 5 books (any type) I have ever read. Take it slow to get his rhythm and style and have a good dictionary handy. I agree with T. Scott, it was a fun read. Work, but fun.
Thanks folks for the reading tip. I read fragments/excerpts of his work in graduate school. Unfortunately, it got blended with a few other rhetoricians that were not, shall we say, as easy to get into? Actually Ong was one of the rhetoricians I could get into, but it sounds like it is time to do a revisit. *Checks his library catalog* Hmm, only about 200 pages, and, 1982? Wow, the title suggests something more recent; I guess it goes to show how some works can remain relevant over time. I’ll let all of you know when I do read it. Meantime, best, and keep on blogging.
Hey Angel, if you don’t get to it for a while let me know when you start. I’d love to re-read it. Can’t do it anytime soon … and of course if you desire to dive right in, don’t let me hold you back either.
And anyone else reading these exchanges, I highly recommend the Ong to all of you.