<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carnival has moved on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chadwick Seagraves</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Chadwick Seagraves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Sorry again that the post verification plug-in isn&#039;t working for you.  I have been testing it from home in multiple browsers and haven&#039;t been able to duplicate your error.  

The b2evolution blog software that I use is not as robust as wordpress in some ways, but it had other things I liked that made it worth choosing for me.  I installed several blogs when I got started doing this and tried them out.  This worked best for me.

I have looked at the other options for comment moderation that might work for me.  I want to leave it turned on tho.  I get tons of referrer hits because of b2e&#039;s referrer statistics function.  

I have deleted the stats section from my blog and have edited the .htaccess file to help cut down on spam as well.  I will keep testing and if it happens again will probably switch to another method.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Sorry again that the post verification plug-in isn&#8217;t working for you.  I have been testing it from home in multiple browsers and haven&#8217;t been able to duplicate your error.  </p>
<p>The b2evolution blog software that I use is not as robust as wordpress in some ways, but it had other things I liked that made it worth choosing for me.  I installed several blogs when I got started doing this and tried them out.  This worked best for me.</p>
<p>I have looked at the other options for comment moderation that might work for me.  I want to leave it turned on tho.  I get tons of referrer hits because of b2e&#8217;s referrer statistics function.  </p>
<p>I have deleted the stats section from my blog and have edited the .htaccess file to help cut down on spam as well.  I will keep testing and if it happens again will probably switch to another method.  <img src='http://marklindner.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>Yep, multiple links will do that--I have WordPress itself set to force anything with multiple links into moderation, and Spam Kismet will start to edge toward spam. 

As for your final sentence: Sorry, but my three-meter rod is out of commission. Oh, but then, I wouldn&#039;t use it on that line anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, multiple links will do that&#8211;I have WordPress itself set to force anything with multiple links into moderation, and Spam Kismet will start to edge toward spam. </p>
<p>As for your final sentence: Sorry, but my three-meter rod is out of commission. Oh, but then, I wouldn&#8217;t use it on that line anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much Walt!  I didn&#039;t realize that for some reason.  I&#039;ll definitely look into it.

I&#039;m assuming your comment got caught for moderation because of the multiple links.  At least &quot;it&quot; knew to moderate it and not put it in the spam.  Weirdly, earlier my two replies got caught as spam.  I mean seriously, am I going to spam myself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much Walt!  I didn&#8217;t realize that for some reason.  I&#8217;ll definitely look into it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming your comment got caught for moderation because of the multiple links.  At least &#8220;it&#8221; knew to moderate it and not put it in the spam.  Weirdly, earlier my two replies got caught as spam.  I mean seriously, am I going to spam myself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Mark, You don&#039;t need to learn how to read your log files, since you&#039;re on LISHost. Urchin comes standard with every LISHost account. That&#039;s how I get my numbers...

Just go here:
http://lishost.org/support/
to link to Urchin--or, for that matter, directly here:
http://lishost.org:8082/
[Which you&#039;ll want to bookmark.]
All you need is your accountname and password.

If you have problems, shoot Blake a line. 

I can check all three of my sites (waltcrawford.name, walt.lishost.org, and citesandinsights.info) from the one address. Very easy, VERY informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, You don&#8217;t need to learn how to read your log files, since you&#8217;re on LISHost. Urchin comes standard with every LISHost account. That&#8217;s how I get my numbers&#8230;</p>
<p>Just go here:<br />
<a href="http://lishost.org/support/" rel="nofollow">http://lishost.org/support/</a><br />
to link to Urchin&#8211;or, for that matter, directly here:<br />
<a href="http://lishost.org:8082/" rel="nofollow">http://lishost.org:8082/</a><br />
[Which you'll want to bookmark.]<br />
All you need is your accountname and password.</p>
<p>If you have problems, shoot Blake a line. </p>
<p>I can check all three of my sites (waltcrawford.name, walt.lishost.org, and citesandinsights.info) from the one address. Very easy, VERY informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>Hi Walt,

I agree  with you.  And from what you&#039;ve said on your blog, I imagine you get a lot more than me.  Akismet is working wonderfully for me so far.  We&#039;ll see how it holds up as the new template is supposed to be optimized for search engines [not why I chose it, but nothing to snort about either].  It does seem as if the spam has shot up as well in the last day but, so far, Akismet has caught it all.

I have no idea what my traffic is anymore as I haven&#039;t taken the time to learn how to read my log files.  Guess I ought to do that one of these days.

Maybe I am gaining some benefit from Blake&#039;s server tuning, too.  :)  

I do appreciate that many people get for more spam than I do visits, so I can understand the &quot;necessity&quot; of such measures, but they just seem so antithetical to conversational-style blogging.  I also understand not everyone is trying to have a conversation....

Anyway, Chadwick was more than gracious and was happy to know that there may be an issue with his implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Walt,</p>
<p>I agree  with you.  And from what you&#8217;ve said on your blog, I imagine you get a lot more than me.  Akismet is working wonderfully for me so far.  We&#8217;ll see how it holds up as the new template is supposed to be optimized for search engines [not why I chose it, but nothing to snort about either].  It does seem as if the spam has shot up as well in the last day but, so far, Akismet has caught it all.</p>
<p>I have no idea what my traffic is anymore as I haven&#8217;t taken the time to learn how to read my log files.  Guess I ought to do that one of these days.</p>
<p>Maybe I am gaining some benefit from Blake&#8217;s server tuning, too.  <img src='http://marklindner.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>I do appreciate that many people get for more spam than I do visits, so I can understand the &#8220;necessity&#8221; of such measures, but they just seem so antithetical to conversational-style blogging.  I also understand not everyone is trying to have a conversation&#8230;.</p>
<p>Anyway, Chadwick was more than gracious and was happy to know that there may be an issue with his implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2006/11/03/carnival-has-moved-on/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>I wonder about capchas, even for those of us with normal eyesight. My weblog may not be hot stuff, but I do get around 1,200 sessions a day, and I do get a fair number of comments...and, with Blake Carver&#039;s server tuning, my choice of blocking all linkbacks, and only moderately severe Spam Karma settings, spam isn&#039;t enough of a problem to require Capcha. (From what I&#039;ve heard, Akismet might do even better.)

I can appreciate that some sites really do need capcha-style tools because they get way too much spam or because the owners don&#039;t have time to check what does show up. But I&#039;d like to think of Capcha as a third-to-last resort (the last two being full moderation or turning off comments entirely).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder about capchas, even for those of us with normal eyesight. My weblog may not be hot stuff, but I do get around 1,200 sessions a day, and I do get a fair number of comments&#8230;and, with Blake Carver&#8217;s server tuning, my choice of blocking all linkbacks, and only moderately severe Spam Karma settings, spam isn&#8217;t enough of a problem to require Capcha. (From what I&#8217;ve heard, Akismet might do even better.)</p>
<p>I can appreciate that some sites really do need capcha-style tools because they get way too much spam or because the owners don&#8217;t have time to check what does show up. But I&#8217;d like to think of Capcha as a third-to-last resort (the last two being full moderation or turning off comments entirely).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

