<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roy Harris, philosopher and linguist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/06/05/roy-harris-philosopher-and-linguist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/06/05/roy-harris-philosopher-and-linguist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/06/05/roy-harris-philosopher-and-linguist/comment-page-1/#comment-4976</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/06/05/roy-harris-philosopher-and-linguist/#comment-4976</guid>
		<description>Jenn, I might suggest you read The Language-Makers before The Language Machine, depending....

The Language Machine is fairly heavily AI, cog sci, philosophy-based.  Luckily for me I got all that.  It was the linguistics that I lacked.  

The Language-Makers is heavier on the linguistics but is a more historical critique than a technical critique.

But then I have no doubt that you can hang with both.  Maybe read the epilogue and then switch and then switch back.  Whatever works for you. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenn, I might suggest you read The Language-Makers before The Language Machine, depending&#8230;.</p>
<p>The Language Machine is fairly heavily AI, cog sci, philosophy-based.  Luckily for me I got all that.  It was the linguistics that I lacked.  </p>
<p>The Language-Makers is heavier on the linguistics but is a more historical critique than a technical critique.</p>
<p>But then I have no doubt that you can hang with both.  Maybe read the epilogue and then switch and then switch back.  Whatever works for you. <img src='http://marklindner.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/06/05/roy-harris-philosopher-and-linguist/comment-page-1/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/06/05/roy-harris-philosopher-and-linguist/#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>WOAH.

*hurries to find book*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOAH.</p>
<p>*hurries to find book*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

