<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accountability and Acts of Professional Classification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/12/23/accountability-and-acts-of-professional-classification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/12/23/accountability-and-acts-of-professional-classification/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Rochkind</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/12/23/accountability-and-acts-of-professional-classification/comment-page-1/#comment-14165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rochkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/12/23/accountability-and-acts-of-professional-classification/#comment-14165</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Librarians (academic or otherwise), unlike linguists and LIKE doctors or lawyers, DO interact with the public as part of their jobs. The job of a librarian, like that of most lawyers or doctors, is _inherently_ a service job, providing a service to clients or customers, and necessarily interacting with them.

The key point of the your first Hutton quote seems to be that linguists are NOT that. That is why &quot;They do not have to explain themselves, or what they are doing, to others qua specialists&quot;. No?

So I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m buying the analogy to librarians.

On the other hand, I&#039;m always open to a new explanation of the nature of the crisis of librarianship, because there is clearly is one (or several), and it/they could use some explaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Librarians (academic or otherwise), unlike linguists and LIKE doctors or lawyers, DO interact with the public as part of their jobs. The job of a librarian, like that of most lawyers or doctors, is _inherently_ a service job, providing a service to clients or customers, and necessarily interacting with them.</p>
<p>The key point of the your first Hutton quote seems to be that linguists are NOT that. That is why &#8220;They do not have to explain themselves, or what they are doing, to others qua specialists&#8221;. No?</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m buying the analogy to librarians.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;m always open to a new explanation of the nature of the crisis of librarianship, because there is clearly is one (or several), and it/they could use some explaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/12/23/accountability-and-acts-of-professional-classification/comment-page-1/#comment-14146</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/2007/12/23/accountability-and-acts-of-professional-classification/#comment-14146</guid>
		<description>I left a comment on one of your previous posts. I do not know who you are, but you indicated that you spoke with Mark Moss on December 6, 2007. I am Sarah Reed&#039;s sister - please read the comment I wrote on your post concerning her family - I knew all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left a comment on one of your previous posts. I do not know who you are, but you indicated that you spoke with Mark Moss on December 6, 2007. I am Sarah Reed&#8217;s sister &#8211; please read the comment I wrote on your post concerning her family &#8211; I knew all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

