Of course I was planning on attending ASIS&T this year in Columbus, OH, but now I have an even better reason than simply because I enjoy it. Some friends (and real researchers) “roped me into” being on a panel and we just heard today that it was accepted.
“Tagging as a Communication Device: The Impact of Communities on Transforming Tag Information”
Panel: Heather D. Pfeiffer, Emma Tonkin, Margaret E. I. Kipp, David R. Millen and me.
These folks will be speaking on their research on effects of communities on tagging as a form of communication. I hope to contribute something based on Integrationism. In what ways do communities use tags as a way to integrate their language and communication?
In a sense, I’m the armchair philosopher, linguist and communications theorist on the panel. [Which is exactly the argument I tried to use to get out of it.] Thankfully, though, I’ll be no Descartes Kant trying to get back-to-basics, doubting all, rolling a ball of wax between my fingers and musing. The heck with the radical skepticism, although it serves a purpose on occasion. I have a few decades of experience with this whole use of language and communication thing, and I have spent most of those musing on, and struggling with, both. I have read just a few score things on both and I intend to “stand on the shoulders of giants.” Perhaps they are neglected giants but I hope to give them some exposure. While I rarely think of myself as a researcher, I do fit the Andrew Abbott view of “library researcher.” [And, no, I am not trying to compare myself to Descartes Kant, who despite being wrong about so much was still far more brilliant than I could ever be.]
The first giants, though, that I want to give some credit to are two of my friends for, in effect, facilitating this opportunity for me. If not for the help of two friends I made at my first ASIS&T conference 2 years ago in Austin I would not have this opportunity.
Benjamin Hockenberry (washtublibrarian), who I “met” through our blogs was my roommate. Now Ben is a bit introverted himself, but with the help of one of his Buffalo peeps we both came out of our shells a bit while there.
The lovely and talented Jennifer Graham (jennimi) was (and is!) such an inspiration. There is no question that when I listen to Haley Bonar singing, “… you must have too many women on your mind …,” that she is at or near the forefront. Always.
Jenn brought us both out of our shells and allowed us to meet some extremely interesting, and fun, people; several of whom I am now on a panel with.
I also want to thank Kathryn La Barre, Allen Renear, and Carole Palmer for believing in me and providing me positive ways to view my being “roped in.” I have no doubt that there are outstanding faculty and mentors at all of the LIS schools, but here at UIUC we are amazingly blessed.
And, Carole, even if I have to pay someone to “design” it for me, I promise to have the “habitually probing generalist” shirts made before ASIS&T this year.
7 responses so far ↓
1 Kirsten // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:13 am
Congrats, Mark!
It sounds like a very interesting panel on it’s own, but I do have to say that so often the theory is missing from otherwise interesting panels, so I’m glad you got roped into it.
2 Christina Pikas // Apr 8, 2008 at 11:01 am
Congrats! I’m so happy you’ll be there and that you’ll be on this panel - I think you have a lot to offer and I’m looking forward to learning from you.
3 Mark // Apr 8, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Thanks, Kirsten. I know what you mean. I do think my fellow panelists can hold their own with theory though, although they may be trying to create it.
Well, I guess I’m trying to create some, too, but in a different way.
Thanks, Christina. But you know I rely on you to keep me on the straight and narrow.
There’s a good possibility that in my larger project that I’m narrowing my focus to specifically IS issues, at least primarily. That way I can avoid the minefield of wandering into areas of our discipline that I know little about. If I stay with these issues long term, and I think I might, then I’ll eventually end up there.
4 Andrew Mehmetbegovic // Apr 12, 2008 at 6:09 am
Surely you know it was Descartes with the ball of wax and radical scepticism?
5 Mark // Apr 12, 2008 at 10:02 am
Oh, Good Lord! Thank you, Andrew.
I’m not sure where that came from. Actually, I am sure where it came from; just not sure how it still forced its way in to my use of Descartes.
I cataloged an interesting book entitled Kant and Skepticism a few weeks back. I want to check it out but have to wait for it to finish the rest of its processing and to get sent to Main Stacks and shelved. Thus, the dust jacket sits on my desk, and a catalog record sits in my email, saying “get me.” Thus, those two concepts have been on my brain together for a while now.
Still. I feel particularly stupid at this point. Sigh.
6 jennimi // Apr 24, 2008 at 10:32 pm
blush. you rawk Mark.
7 Mark // Apr 25, 2008 at 5:57 am
I only try to tell the truth. As I see it, anyway.
It is through having friends like you that I am able to rawk.
Leave a Comment