<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some things read this week feature is over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/</link>
	<description>Palmer, CL. “Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science.”  JASIS 50(3): 242-253, 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-20750</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=979#comment-20750</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nathan.  Sorry for taking so long to get back to your comment; been trying to take care of some personal issues.

I appreciate your comments. Let&#039;s not think of it like I&#039;ve stopped. I haven&#039;t really been reading much lately anyway, at least not on my normal topics. I have been reading a bit in one broad &quot;applied&quot; subject area but as I said I won&#039;t be discussing that here anyway.

I will try and discuss some of the things I read once I start reading again and I honestly am not seeing myself getting back into that amount of reading anytime soon anyway.  Thus, it might be easier to do a better job with the things I do peruse.

I have a book review that I am working on for publication [main priority at the moment], and then I need to seriously get to reading the last few things for my CAS paper. I will also need to re-read many things so perhaps further (or 1st-time) commentary on some of them will come about.

It&#039;s really hard to say what will happen but I guess I primarily needed to remove the pressure of doing them each week and the feeling bad if I did a poor job on any entry and if I didn&#039;t read much that week, etc. It&#039;s already a big relief cutting myself that slack. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nathan.  Sorry for taking so long to get back to your comment; been trying to take care of some personal issues.</p>
<p>I appreciate your comments. Let&#8217;s not think of it like I&#8217;ve stopped. I haven&#8217;t really been reading much lately anyway, at least not on my normal topics. I have been reading a bit in one broad &#8220;applied&#8221; subject area but as I said I won&#8217;t be discussing that here anyway.</p>
<p>I will try and discuss some of the things I read once I start reading again and I honestly am not seeing myself getting back into that amount of reading anytime soon anyway.  Thus, it might be easier to do a better job with the things I do peruse.</p>
<p>I have a book review that I am working on for publication [main priority at the moment], and then I need to seriously get to reading the last few things for my CAS paper. I will also need to re-read many things so perhaps further (or 1st-time) commentary on some of them will come about.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really hard to say what will happen but I guess I primarily needed to remove the pressure of doing them each week and the feeling bad if I did a poor job on any entry and if I didn&#8217;t read much that week, etc. It&#8217;s already a big relief cutting myself that slack. <img src='http://marklindner.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-20556</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=979#comment-20556</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I will miss it.  I learned a lot from everything you abstacted for me.  Thanks so much for that work.  Sorry I have not commented on your blog lately.  I read everything you post and always hope and pray you are doing well. 

Thanks again,
Nathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I will miss it.  I learned a lot from everything you abstacted for me.  Thanks so much for that work.  Sorry I have not commented on your blog lately.  I read everything you post and always hope and pray you are doing well. </p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-20555</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=979#comment-20555</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. That&#039;s an interesting point, Lisa. Thanks. I have gotten some general comments over time on &quot;Some things read ...&quot; but that is nice to know.

I had joined the GSLIS Reads Facebook group and contributed several of my actual commentaries/reviews on some of the better things in a couple categories but got absolutely no feedback. I won&#039;t disparage the YA and adult pop lit discussions as clearly more people read and are interested in those items than what I have been reading. 

But. A little interest from LIS students and faculty didn&#039;t seem to be asking much. I checked back in yesterday after months and still no feedback. Of course, it doesn&#039;t look to be too hopping of a place period ... but still.

Anyway, thanks. If/when our tools for the collection of bibliographic metadata to the consistent output, sharing and updating thereof improve I will try to put some of my bibliographies/reading lists on the Web. Perhaps those could serve the same kind of use case.

Angel and jenny, GoodReads looks useful but I&#039;ve already got LibraryThing and Zotero and .... I guess I need to experience it&#039;s social aspects before I can really say. But I really wonder how many folks that use that site might be interested in what I&#039;ve been reading. I mean, I might get voted off the island. See my comments above re lack of feedback from my own student peers on what I read in our FB group.

A big issue for me, though, is much of what I read is not going to be there, nor is it in Amazon as supposedly most everything is, based on their claim (hahaha).  Thus, I&#039;d be doing even more manual data entry. 

Oh well. This is a minor issue to work out compared to others lately. ;-)

Thanks all for the comments, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. That&#8217;s an interesting point, Lisa. Thanks. I have gotten some general comments over time on &#8220;Some things read &#8230;&#8221; but that is nice to know.</p>
<p>I had joined the GSLIS Reads Facebook group and contributed several of my actual commentaries/reviews on some of the better things in a couple categories but got absolutely no feedback. I won&#8217;t disparage the YA and adult pop lit discussions as clearly more people read and are interested in those items than what I have been reading. </p>
<p>But. A little interest from LIS students and faculty didn&#8217;t seem to be asking much. I checked back in yesterday after months and still no feedback. Of course, it doesn&#8217;t look to be too hopping of a place period &#8230; but still.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks. If/when our tools for the collection of bibliographic metadata to the consistent output, sharing and updating thereof improve I will try to put some of my bibliographies/reading lists on the Web. Perhaps those could serve the same kind of use case.</p>
<p>Angel and jenny, GoodReads looks useful but I&#8217;ve already got LibraryThing and Zotero and &#8230;. I guess I need to experience it&#8217;s social aspects before I can really say. But I really wonder how many folks that use that site might be interested in what I&#8217;ve been reading. I mean, I might get voted off the island. See my comments above re lack of feedback from my own student peers on what I read in our FB group.</p>
<p>A big issue for me, though, is much of what I read is not going to be there, nor is it in Amazon as supposedly most everything is, based on their claim (hahaha).  Thus, I&#8217;d be doing even more manual data entry. </p>
<p>Oh well. This is a minor issue to work out compared to others lately. <img src='http://marklindner.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks all for the comments, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenny</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-20531</link>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=979#comment-20531</guid>
		<description>For books there is Good Reads.  I do definitely enjoy seeing what other people are reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For books there is Good Reads.  I do definitely enjoy seeing what other people are reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-20523</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=979#comment-20523</guid>
		<description>I understand as well that it can be time-consuming. Keeping up is always a challenge in our line of work. For books, I have been much more selective. Since I got the GoodReads account, I just make short notes over there. But I do make some extra notes on the blog if a book really engages me. I still do the articles, my way of keeping that ear to the ground. In the end, you have to go with what works.

Best, and keep on blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand as well that it can be time-consuming. Keeping up is always a challenge in our line of work. For books, I have been much more selective. Since I got the GoodReads account, I just make short notes over there. But I do make some extra notes on the blog if a book really engages me. I still do the articles, my way of keeping that ear to the ground. In the end, you have to go with what works.</p>
<p>Best, and keep on blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://marklindner.info/blog/2008/06/19/some-things-read-this-week-feature-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-20519</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklindner.info/blog/?p=979#comment-20519</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to miss them but I understand it must be time-consuming. This was my way of &quot;keeping an ear to the ground&quot; on one part of librarianship that I don&#039;t get to think about as part of my daily work. Even just reading the citations gave me a sense of some of the issues. I will appreciate the new approach for the same reason!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to miss them but I understand it must be time-consuming. This was my way of &#8220;keeping an ear to the ground&#8221; on one part of librarianship that I don&#8217;t get to think about as part of my daily work. Even just reading the citations gave me a sense of some of the issues. I will appreciate the new approach for the same reason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

